PROTS Public Relations Online Transparency System Weblog

Public Relations Online Transparency System notes and comments. Welcome and please add your contributions with the understanding that this blog is specifically for the purpose of documenting the creation of this system.

Location: Boardman, Ohio, United States

Integrating Telemarketing and Sales Strategies with Internet Marketing Strategies.

Monday, July 09, 2007

Wondering Why?

Some time back. Well nearly two years ago, I started this blog with the express intent of having Public Relations Experts and Practitioners help me create a Transparency Code of Ethics of sorts. So we could collectively help each other understand how to know when to be transparent and when to be discreet.

Now I am wondering why there has been no input. Is the Public Relations Industry as a whole to busy to bother with this? Is it unimportant? Did the people who practice PR decide to not publish their ideas on this topic?

The blog is still open to responsible commentary. And suggestions. I wonder why PR practitioners have not joined me in this quest? Any ideas?

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, April 12, 2005

Transparency, Openness, & Honesty in the Practice of PR

So much has been said and written on this issue. As this blog is designed specifically to create a working framework to assess how to take theory into practice, I am setting forth a few standards that should hopefully begin the conversation.
  1. Compromising openness is stepping onto a slippery slope. The very first time it enters your mind, or your practice to compromise complete openness, you have taken a step onto a high wire of ethics. Without a net. Here is why: Once you have decided that it is acceptable to conceal information on behalf of your client or begin to conceal facts that are relevant to a given situation you have set into motion the "practice of concealment". This then will not only tell your client that it is OK to conceal facts, but that you yourself is a nontrustworthy entity in their perception of any situation that involves PR. There is no way to win this argument. If you will lie for your client you will lie to cover your own butt. In your client's eyes you become someone who cannot be trusted. Never compromise openness for your client willingly.
  2. Transparency is not a relativistic consideration. You can never justify nontransparency as a PR Practitioner. As the stated goal of Public Relations is to initiate and maintain "relations" with a set of defined publics; it is impossible to justify nontransparency and expect to maintain any kind of relationship. This would be a completely oxymoronic position. Either you initiate and maintain relationships or you somehow attempt to deceive your audiences. You cannot have it both ways.
  3. Honesty is not a relative commitment. Either you are honest or you are not. There is no way to be honest sometimes with any hope of keeping track of whatever deceptions you spin towards your clients, their publics, or yourself. Once the commitment to honesty is compromised, the practice of PR becomes much too complicated. What will you do, keep a journal of all the deceptions you have spun so you can keep them straight? Forget about it. It aint going to happen. Either you are true or false and eventually what you are will be proven.
Do you have anything to add? Would that be all there is to creating a Public Relations Online Transparency System so that the practitioners of PR have some standards to guide themselves with?

Wednesday, February 09, 2005

PROTS Public Relations Online Transparency System

Welcome to the PROTS Blog. Hopefully, this will be an ongoing effort to define and describe the use of transparency within the Public Relations field.

Feel free to make any relevant contribution as to how we can help each other understand and practice using a responsible and ethical balance between discretion and disclosure.